[Facebook and privacy] "Everyone knows Sarah" TS4

Sarah would be happy, she acts in a TV spot

Do you think Sarah is a victim or do you rather think she deserves what she got?

Axel le vrai wrote:Sarah would be happy, she acts in a TV spot

I think you are being mistaken between the actress who plays Sarah and the character Sarah ...

She obviously deserve what happens to her because the sentence of the pervert shows she went too far on the Internet.
Nothing would happen if she posted "usuals things", I think.

I agree that she mustn't realize the consequences of posting those pictures but she is a victim just because of she !

I agree with you too. According to me, she isn't aware of the dangers of the Internet. She's unconscious. However, you have to be mad to post a picture in underwear !

She is a victim but it's her fault. She would have to be careful.

she is stupid !! she doesn't know how to used the internet !! how old is she ?! 6 years old ?!

Me, i'm asking if sarah's parents watch her because she posts a picture about her underwear( ), she is young and normally parents know what childrens do on internet. But it's right that men's are heavy and a little pervet.

Do your own parents know what you do on the Internet?

According to Cyril999, Sarah is still girl, and her parents have, during her teenage years more than never, to watch Sarah and her internet activity ! There so many people ill-intentioned ! (Sarah should have reflected of course, BUT, a teenager does not reflect (cf lesson of SVT!)

No private jokes allowed. Thanks!

I think she's a stupid girl too,because even if she is a teenager, she had to know how post a picture of herself in underwear is dangerous. Then,she is a victim too because the mens are pervert,instead of explain her is bad,they wants others pictures of her.

I think she deserves what she obtained because she is a victim of her reputation.

Yanis2 wrote:Then,she is a victim too because the mens are pervert,instead of explain her is bad,they wants others pictures of her.

I agree with you. They are always pervert men on the Internet that we have to think before use the Internet.

I think she deserves what she obtained because she is a victim of her reputation.

I think Sarah doesn't know the danger of Internet and their parents don't know that she posts

Do you think parents should interfere with their children's private lives on the Internet?

I think parents have to interfere with children who which are less than 14 because children are not really aware of what they do on the internet

Why 14? Are you a child before and an adult after 14?

Sarah has a bad reputation because of picures what she had posed in Internet.

Kédem Ferré wrote:Do you think parents should interfere with their children's private lives on the Internet?

Yes,because when a girl take a picture of her in underwear and post it on internet we can think she needs parents who told her to don't do this.

conclusion: man are pervert and girls are stupid!

Yanis2 wrote:

Kédem Ferré wrote:Do you think parents should interfere with their children's private lives on the Internet?

Yes,because when a girl take a picture of her in underwear and post it on internet we can think she needs parents who told her to don't do this.

Yes, sure, I totaly agree with you, Sarah's parents had to watch them daughter !